- clearly erroneous rule
- A standard followed in reviewing a determination of an administrative agency. 2 Am J2d Admin L § 619.
Ballentine's law dictionary. Anderson, W.S.. 1998.
clearly erroneous rule
Look at other dictionaries:
clearly erroneous — clear·ly erroneous adj: being or containing a finding of fact that is not supported by substantial or competent evidence or by reasonable inferences findings of fact...shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous Federal Rules of Civil… … Law dictionary
clearly erroneous — For purposes of rule providing that findings of trial court shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, refers to findings when based upon substantial error in proceedings or misapplication of law, Kauk v. Anderson, C.C.A.N.D., 137 F.2d 331 … Black's law dictionary
clearly erroneous — For purposes of rule providing that findings of trial court shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, refers to findings when based upon substantial error in proceedings or misapplication of law, Kauk v. Anderson, C.C.A.N.D., 137 F.2d 331 … Black's law dictionary
substantial evidence rule — The rule that a determination of fact by an administrative body should be upheld unless arbitrary or clearly wrong; that a ruling based on findings supported by substantial evidence shall be sustained unless they rest on erroneous legal… … Ballentine's law dictionary
Official scorer — Booth of the official scorer in Taichung Intercontinental Baseball Stadium (Taiwan) In the game of … Wikipedia
Standard of review — In law, the standard of review is the amount of deference given by one court (or some other appellate tribunal) in reviewing a decision of a lower court or tribunal. A low standard of review means that the decision under review will be varied or… … Wikipedia
procedural law — Law that prescribes the procedures and methods for enforcing rights and duties and for obtaining redress (e.g., in a suit). It is distinguished from substantive law (i.e., law that creates, defines, or regulates rights and duties). Procedural law … Universalium
Croats — Hrvati … Wikipedia
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants=Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. ArgueDate=January 29 ArgueYear=1946 DecideDate=June 10 DecideYear=1946 FullName=Anderson et al. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. USVol=328 USPage=680 Citation=66 S. Ct. 1187; 90 L. Ed.… … Wikipedia
Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union — Soviet Union … Wikipedia
